Claims are construed in communications patent
CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a/ GE Licensing v. Agere Systems, Inc. C.A. No. 07-170-JJF, July 10, 2008.
Farnan, J. The court construes a total of 14 claim terms from two patents
Claims are construed in communications patent
CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a/ GE Licensing v. Agere Systems, Inc. C.A. No. 07-170-JJF, July 10, 2008.
Farnan, J. The court construes a total of 14 claim terms from two patents
Claims are construed in communications patent
CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a/ GE Licensing v. Agere Systems, Inc. C.A. No. 07-170-JJF, July 10, 2008.
Farnan, J. The court construes a total of 14 claim terms from two patents
Patent claims held invalid due to nonstatutory double patenting
Farnan, J. After a bench trial, the Court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Court ruled that disputed claims were infringed, but that the claims at issue are invalid for nonstatutory double patenting.
Continue Reading...Case is dismissed due to first-filed Texas action naming incorrect affiliate
Remy Inc., et al. v. CIF Licensing, et al., C.A. No. 06-785- (GMS/MPT), June 9, 2008.
Thynge, M.J. Defendant’s motion to dismiss due to pending litigation first filed in Texas is granted.
Case is dismissed for lack of standing
McKesson Automation, Inc. v. Swisslogic Holding AG, et al., C.A. No. 06-28-(SLR-LPS), May 30, 2008.
Stark, M.J. Magistrate recommends that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted due to plaintiff’s lack of standing to sue.
Court denies cross-motions for summary judgment on claims for breach of settlement agreement
Sleet, C.J. Prior settlement agreement precludes invalidity argument for different product.
Non-party is sanctioned for vexatious conduct during discovery dispute
In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation., C.A. No. 05-1717 JJF, May 14, 2008.
Farnan, J. This Court adopts Special Master’s recommendation that non-party be sanctioned for vexatious litigation conduct during adjudication of discovery dispute.
Court lacks jurisdiction over interference appeal
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 07-780 SLR, May 9, 2008.
Robinson, J. Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 146 where plaintiff seeks adverse judgment on appeal from concession on priority during interference process.
Court issues contempt order against defendant for failure to abide by injunction
Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 01-051 GMS (May 5, 2008).
Sleet, C.J. Plaintiff’s motion for contempt of Court is granted in part; its post-trial motions for entry of final judgment, enhanced damages, attorneys fees and prejudgment interest are granted in part. Defendants’ motions for JMOL or a new trial as to willfulness and damages are denied
Continue Reading...